| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Chapman Flack <chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Markus Winand <markus(dot)winand(at)winand(dot)at>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: House style for DocBook documentation? |
| Date: | 2019-01-26 08:31:13 |
| Message-ID: | ae85fa30-5aea-ef56-6506-b8af2d3507ba@2ndquadrant.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 25/01/2019 15:37, Chapman Flack wrote:
>> External links already create footnotes in the PDF output. Is that
>> different from what you are saying?
> That might, only, indicate that I was just thinking aloud in email and
> had not gone and checked in PDF output to see how the links were handled.
>
> Yes, it could very possibly indicate that.
>
> If they are already processed that way, does that mean the
>
> o Do not use text with <ulink> so the URL appears in printed output
>
> in README.links should be considered obsolete, and removed even, and
> doc authors should feel free to put link text in <ulink> without
> hesitation?
I think it's obsolete, yes.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Lætitia Avrot | 2019-01-26 09:50:15 | [Patch] Log10 and hyperbolic functions for SQL:2016 compliance |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2019-01-26 08:25:17 | Re: using expression syntax for partition bounds |