Re: using expression syntax for partition bounds

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: using expression syntax for partition bounds
Date: 2019-01-26 08:25:17
Message-ID: 0e912d85-0c49-013d-1ed7-ef66609022fc@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 25/01/2019 16:19, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
>> committed
>
> Some of the buildfarm members are having sort-ordering problems
> with this. Looks like you could work around it with different
> partition names (don't assume the relative sort order of
> letters and digits).

Fixed by light renaming.

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2019-01-26 08:31:13 Re: House style for DocBook documentation?
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2019-01-26 08:08:30 Re: proposal: new polymorphic types - commontype and commontypearray