Re: logical replication - still unstable after all these months

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: logical replication - still unstable after all these months
Date: 2017-06-17 22:27:25
Message-ID: ae3b727c-de41-5055-9dd9-a8c28339e0a7@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 6/17/17 06:48, Erik Rijkers wrote:
> On 2017-05-28 12:44, Erik Rijkers wrote:
>
> re: srsubstate in pg_subscription_rel:
>
>> No idea what it means. At the very least this value 'w' is missing
>> from the documentation, which only mentions:
>> i = initalize
>> d = data copy
>> s = synchronized
>> r = (normal replication)
>
> Shouldn't we add this to that table (51.53) in the documentation?
>
> After all, the value 'w' does show up when you monitor
> pg_subscription_rel.

It's not supposed to. Have you seen it after
e3a815d2faa5be28551e71d5db44fb2c78133433?

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dmitry Dolgov 2017-06-17 22:50:50 Re: type cache for concat functions
Previous Message Marco Atzeri 2017-06-17 22:25:32 initdb initalization failure for collation "ja_JP"