Re: logical replication - still unstable after all these months

From: Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: logical replication - still unstable after all these months
Date: 2017-06-18 04:59:47
Message-ID: 558e658f8b6e42a68fdeaac5205a4782@xs4all.nl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2017-06-18 00:27, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 6/17/17 06:48, Erik Rijkers wrote:
>> On 2017-05-28 12:44, Erik Rijkers wrote:
>>
>> re: srsubstate in pg_subscription_rel:
>>
>>> No idea what it means. At the very least this value 'w' is missing
>>> from the documentation, which only mentions:
>>> i = initalize
>>> d = data copy
>>> s = synchronized
>>> r = (normal replication)
>>
>> Shouldn't we add this to that table (51.53) in the documentation?
>>
>> After all, the value 'w' does show up when you monitor
>> pg_subscription_rel.
>
> It's not supposed to. Have you seen it after
> e3a815d2faa5be28551e71d5db44fb2c78133433?

Ah no, I haven't seen that 'w'-value after that (and 1000s of tests ran
without error since then).

I just hadn't realized that that w-value I had reported was indeed a
erroneous state.

thanks, this is OK then.

Erik Rijkers

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Julien Rouhaud 2017-06-18 05:40:18 Re: Typo in planstats.sgml
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2017-06-18 04:40:03 Re: type cache for concat functions