Re: pgstat vs aset

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com>, Sami Imseih <samimseih(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Treat <rob(at)xzilla(dot)net>, satyanarlapuram(at)gmail(dot)com, tndrwang(at)gmail(dot)com
Subject: Re: pgstat vs aset
Date: 2026-04-09 00:20:00
Message-ID: adbwsOCfn71YQeMv@paquier.xyz
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Apr 08, 2026 at 07:04:58PM -0400, Andres Freund wrote:
> Seems like a fairly obvious change.

This gain is a nice surprise. I am +1 for the sneak argument with
v19.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nathan Bossart 2026-04-09 00:57:23 Re: Add pg_stat_autovacuum_priority
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2026-04-09 00:00:37 Re: s/pg_attribute_always_inline/pg_always_inline/?