Re: Change JOIN tutorial to focus more on explicit joins

From: Jürgen Purtz <juergen(at)purtz(dot)de>
To: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Anastasia Lubennikova <a(dot)lubennikova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Change JOIN tutorial to focus more on explicit joins
Date: 2020-12-01 08:38:20
Message-ID: acf6b4ca-e8a2-4646-eb6f-85e931af7d86@purtz.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers

On 30.11.20 21:25, David G. Johnston wrote:
> Sorry, I managed to overlook the most recent patch.
>
> I admitted my use of parentheses was incorrect and I don't see anyone
> else defending them.  Please remove them.
>
> Minor typos:
>
> "the database compare" -> needs an "s" (compares)
>
> "In this case, the definition how to compare their rows." -> remove,
> redundant with the first sentence
>
> "The results from the older implicit syntax, and the newer explicit
> JOIN/ON syntax, are identical" -> move the commas around to what is
> shown here
>
> David J.
>
>
OK. Patch attached.

--

J. Purtz

Attachment Content-Type Size
0004-query.patch text/x-patch 6.5 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2020-12-01 12:39:04 Re: Consistent reference to RFCs in the documentation
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2020-12-01 08:21:15 Re: index items for pg_stat_progress_xxx views

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message vignesh C 2020-12-01 08:45:17 Re: Printing backtrace of postgres processes
Previous Message Masahiko Sawada 2020-12-01 08:31:00 Re: autovac issue with large number of tables