Re: Change JOIN tutorial to focus more on explicit joins

From: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
To: Jürgen Purtz <juergen(at)purtz(dot)de>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Change JOIN tutorial to focus more on explicit joins
Date: 2021-03-10 13:06:16
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers

On 12/1/20 3:38 AM, Jürgen Purtz wrote:
> On 30.11.20 21:25, David G. Johnston wrote:
>> Sorry, I managed to overlook the most recent patch.
>> I admitted my use of parentheses was incorrect and I don't see anyone
>> else defending them.  Please remove them.
>> Minor typos:
>> "the database compare" -> needs an "s" (compares)
>> "In this case, the definition how to compare their rows." -> remove,
>> redundant with the first sentence
>> "The results from the older implicit syntax, and the newer explicit
>> JOIN/ON syntax, are identical" -> move the commas around to what is
>> shown here
> OK. Patch attached.

Peter, you committed some of this patch originally. Do you think the
rest of the patch is now in shape to be committed?


In response to


Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2021-03-10 19:42:21 Re: missing schema_name
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2021-03-09 19:00:13 Re: Transaction ID modulo

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Steele 2021-03-10 13:24:50 Re: error_severity of brin work item
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2021-03-10 12:47:51 Re: shared-memory based stats collector