| From: | David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jürgen Purtz <juergen(at)purtz(dot)de>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Change JOIN tutorial to focus more on explicit joins |
| Date: | 2021-03-10 13:06:16 |
| Message-ID: | 81898782-7e51-30d1-b22b-09809085f534@pgmasters.net |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers |
On 12/1/20 3:38 AM, Jürgen Purtz wrote:
> On 30.11.20 21:25, David G. Johnston wrote:
>> Sorry, I managed to overlook the most recent patch.
>>
>> I admitted my use of parentheses was incorrect and I don't see anyone
>> else defending them. Please remove them.
>>
>> Minor typos:
>>
>> "the database compare" -> needs an "s" (compares)
>>
>> "In this case, the definition how to compare their rows." -> remove,
>> redundant with the first sentence
>>
>> "The results from the older implicit syntax, and the newer explicit
>> JOIN/ON syntax, are identical" -> move the commas around to what is
>> shown here
>>
>>
> OK. Patch attached.
Peter, you committed some of this patch originally. Do you think the
rest of the patch is now in shape to be committed?
Regards,
--
-David
david(at)pgmasters(dot)net
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2021-03-10 19:42:21 | Re: missing schema_name |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2021-03-09 19:00:13 | Re: Transaction ID modulo |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Steele | 2021-03-10 13:24:50 | Re: error_severity of brin work item |
| Previous Message | Fujii Masao | 2021-03-10 12:47:51 | Re: shared-memory based stats collector |