Re: Change JOIN tutorial to focus more on explicit joins

On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 1:15 PM Jürgen Purtz <juergen(at)purtz(dot)de> wrote:

> On 30.11.20 20:45, Anastasia Lubennikova wrote:
> > As far as I see something got committed and now the discussion is stuck
> in arguing about parenthesis.
> > FWIW, I think it is a matter of personal taste. Maybe we can compromise
> on simply leaving this part unchanged.
>
> With or without parenthesis is a little more than a personal taste, but
> it's a very tiny detail. I'm happy with either of the two variants.
>
>
Sorry, I managed to overlook the most recent patch.

I admitted my use of parentheses was incorrect and I don't see anyone else
defending them. Please remove them.

Minor typos:

"the database compare" -> needs an "s" (compares)

"In this case, the definition how to compare their rows." -> remove,
redundant with the first sentence

"The results from the older implicit syntax, and the newer explicit JOIN/ON
syntax, are identical" -> move the commas around to what is shown here

David J.