Re: Catversion bumps during beta (was Re: [Proposal] Expose internal MultiXact member count function for efficient monitoring)

From: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Sami Imseih <samimseih(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Naga Appani <nagnrik(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(at)vondra(dot)me>, Xuneng Zhou <xunengzhou(at)gmail(dot)com>, torikoshia <torikoshia(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Catversion bumps during beta (was Re: [Proposal] Expose internal MultiXact member count function for efficient monitoring)
Date: 2026-09-22 16:40:40
Message-ID: ac7057fe-9e66-47cf-bcc0-c09a46abfce7@iki.fi
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 22/09/2026 19:12, Tom Lane wrote:
> Making beta testers exercise pg_upgrade isn't without benefit.

Oh that's an interesting point, it never occurred to me that there's an
upside like that, in getting more testing of pg_upgrade. :-)

- Heikki

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Manu 2026-09-22 17:23:09 Re: Historic snapshot doesn't track txns committed in BUILDING_SNAPSHOT state
Previous Message Nathan Bossart 2026-09-22 16:33:11 Re: run pgindent in CI