Re: Enable -Wstrict-prototypes and -Wold-style-definition by default

From: Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Enable -Wstrict-prototypes and -Wold-style-definition by default
Date: 2026-03-18 19:15:33
Message-ID: abr51elajA2zUOl7@ip-10-97-1-34.eu-west-3.compute.internal
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On Wed, Mar 18, 2026 at 01:03:03PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > I got this warning while running headerscheck after this commit:

Thanks for the report!

> > ~/Desktop/projects/postgres/src/interfaces/ecpg/ecpglib/ecpglib_extern.h:221:40:
> > warning: function declaration isn’t a prototype [-Wstrict-prototypes]
> > 221 | void ecpg_init_sqlca(struct sqlca_t *sqlca)
>
> Yeah, I see that too. I believe the problem is that headerscheck
> doesn't cause POSTGRES_ECPG_INTERNAL to become defined, so that
> what the compiler is seeing is (from sqlca.h):
>
> #ifndef POSTGRES_ECPG_INTERNAL
> #define sqlca (*ECPGget_sqlca())
> #endif
>
> and then
>
> void ecpg_init_sqlca(struct sqlca_t *sqlca);

Oh right, confirmed with:

"
$ gcc -E -I src/interfaces/ecpg/include -I src/include -I src/interfaces/libpq \
-include src/include/postgres_fe.h src/interfaces/ecpg/ecpglib/ecpglib_extern.h \
| grep ECPGget_sqlca

$ struct sqlca_t *ECPGget_sqlca(void);
$ void ecpg_init_sqlca(struct sqlca_t *(*ECPGget_sqlca()));
"
> Kinda surprising that that's not a syntax error.

Yeah...

> We could plausibly fix this either by
>
> (1) renaming ecpg_init_sqlca's parameter to something else;
>
> (2) ensuring that POSTGRES_ECPG_INTERNAL is defined. I'd be inclined
> to make ecpglib_extern.h do that rather than expecting headerscheck
> to know about it.
>
> Neither of these options are beautiful, but perhaps #1 is slightly
> less ugly. Any preferences?

I'd vote for #1 too, done in the attached.

Regards,

--
Bertrand Drouvot
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

Attachment Content-Type Size
v1-0001-Fix-Wstrict-prototypes-warning-in-ecpg_init_sqlca.patch text/x-diff 2.3 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Henson Choi 2026-03-18 19:22:16 Re: SQL Property Graph Queries (SQL/PGQ)
Previous Message Srinath Reddy Sadipiralla 2026-03-18 19:12:19 Re: Adding REPACK [concurrently]