Re: Add starelid, attnum to pg_stats and leverage this in pg_dump

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com>, Sami Imseih <samimseih(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Add starelid, attnum to pg_stats and leverage this in pg_dump
Date: 2026-03-16 23:02:33
Message-ID: abiMCYxA5JI5T57P@paquier.xyz
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Mar 16, 2026 at 05:52:38PM -0500, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> FTR I'm not mortally opposed to the idea. I just want to get the easier
> stuff out of the way first so we can commit the pg_dump change. Then we
> can give expr_attnum our undivided attention.

Makes sense here to keep it simple. I don't want to change the
extstat restore code more than necessary at this stage of the CF
calendar cycle, except for bugs and issues discussed during the beta
cycle. Perhaps we could do something in this area for v20. Or
perhaps not.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii Masao 2026-03-16 23:07:47 Re: Avoid resource leak (contrib/postgres_fdw/connection.c)
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2026-03-16 22:57:57 Re: tablecmds: reject CLUSTER ON for partitioned tables earlier