| From: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Ranier Vilela <ranier(dot)vf(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Avoid resource leak (contrib/postgres_fdw/connection.c) |
| Date: | 2026-03-16 23:07:47 |
| Message-ID: | CAHGQGwG2iC2LeizHiCezb-D=G6RE-ACXbFVfeAtzXwjnMTveGA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Mar 16, 2026 at 8:46 PM Ranier Vilela <ranier(dot)vf(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
> Per Coverity.
>
> CID 1645716: (#1 of 1): Resource leak (RESOURCE_LEAK)
> 8. leaked_storage: Variable str going out of scope leaks the storage str.data points to.
>
> The function *postgres_fdw_connection* leaks the contents of
> var str.data
> Once that function *cstring_to_text* palloc the contents
> must be necessary to free the var str.data.
It seems that postgres_fdw_connection() is expected to be called by
ForeignServerConnectionString() via OidFunctionCall3(),
and to allocate memory (including str.data) in the FDWConnectionContext
memory context created by ForeignServerConnectionString().
After calling postgres_fdw_connection(), ForeignServerConnectionString()
deletes FDWConnectionContext. So it seems to me that any memory
allocated in that context, including str.data, would not leak. No?
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Fujii Masao | 2026-03-16 23:16:08 | Re: Shutdown indefinitely stuck due to unflushed FPI_FOR_HINT record |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2026-03-16 23:02:33 | Re: Add starelid, attnum to pg_stats and leverage this in pg_dump |