| From: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Make executor's Range Table an array instead of a List |
| Date: | 2018-09-04 07:31:57 |
| Message-ID: | abedb894-b8d8-d67a-a2b8-88c35acc54cc@lab.ntt.co.jp |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2018/08/24 7:22, David Rowley wrote:
> On 24 August 2018 at 02:26, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> One of the patches I sent last week does the same thing, among a
>> couple of other things with regard to handling relations in the
>> executor. On a cursory look at the patch, your take of it looks
>> better than mine. Will test tomorrow. Here is a link to my email:
>>
>> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/468c85d9-540e-66a2-1dde-fec2b741e688@lab.ntt.co.jp
>>
>> 4th of my patches implements the array'fication of executor's range table.
>
> Sorry, didn't realise. I'll withdraw this and review yours during the
> upcoming 'fest.
Since your patch implemented the idea in a better manner, I'm thinking I
should merge it with mine. Is that okay with you?
Thanks,
Amit
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dilip Kumar | 2018-09-04 08:12:48 | Re: pg_verify_checksums failure with hash indexes |
| Previous Message | Dean Rasheed | 2018-09-04 07:21:07 | Re: [HACKERS] proposal: schema variables |