Re: Add parallelism and glibc dependent only options to reindexdb

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Daniel Verite <daniel(at)manitou-mail(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Add parallelism and glibc dependent only options to reindexdb
Date: 2019-07-05 16:16:03
Message-ID: abd97c36-b3a8-643e-7d25-2e54c74e78ea@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2019-07-02 10:30, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> That's a great idea, and would make the parallelism in reindexdb much
> simpler. There's however a downside, as users won't have a way to
> benefit from index filtering until they upgrade to this version. OTOH
> glibc 2.28 is already there, and a hypothetical fancy reindexdb is far
> from being released.

Isn't that also the case for your proposal? We are not going to release
a new reindexdb before a new REINDEX.

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2019-07-05 16:22:19 Re: Add parallelism and glibc dependent only options to reindexdb
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2019-07-05 16:14:31 Re: Fix runtime errors from -fsanitize=undefined