| From: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
|---|---|
| To: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: doc: create table improvements |
| Date: | 2025-10-23 04:43:25 |
| Message-ID: | ab574da206f7cb0db340671d88eff4ae9d66e450.camel@cybertec.at |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 2025-10-20 at 07:41 -0400, David G. Johnston wrote:
> I question whether “parameter” is even the correct class to assign here
> and so would rather avoid the issue by not assigning a class.
Right. I have removed the vestiges from my failed attempt to improve
the "parameter" decorations.
> “If none is specified, the data will be persistent” would be better
> written “If unspecified the data will be persistent” (or, “if not specified…”)
I decided to use the trusted phrasing "by default".
> Everything else looks good.
Patch attached; if it is fine with you, I'll mark it "ready for committer".
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v4-0001-Unclutter-CREATE-TABLE-synopsis.patch | text/x-patch | 5.1 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2025-10-23 04:48:37 | Re: POC: enable logical decoding when wal_level = 'replica' without a server restart |
| Previous Message | David Rowley | 2025-10-23 04:33:08 | Re: Issue with query_is_distinct_for() and grouping sets |