| From: | Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Sergei Kornilov <sk(at)zsrv(dot)org>, Олег Самойлов <splarv(at)ya(dot)ru>, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de> |
| Subject: | Re: basic_archive lost archive_directory |
| Date: | 2026-02-23 21:38:47 |
| Message-ID: | aZzI59OB6SaChOgJ@nathan |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Wed, Feb 11, 2026 at 03:14:15PM -0600, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2026 at 10:06:25AM -0600, Nathan Bossart wrote:
>> As I mentioned upthread, IMHO we should simply remove the existence check
>> from the GUC check hook. basic_archive must already be written to handle
>> the archive directory disappearing at any moment, so we should be able to
>> rely on it without the extra stat().
>
> Concretely, like the attached.
Any thoughts? I'll wait another week or so, but then will proceed with
committing/back-patching this.
--
nathan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2026-02-23 22:22:15 | Re: basic_archive lost archive_directory |
| Previous Message | Álvaro Herrera | 2026-02-23 20:23:25 | Re: BUG #19414: Wrong rows returned by index scan on HASH-partitioned table with PRIMARY KEY (PostgreSQL 16.9) |