| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | VASUKI M <vasukim1992002(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, BharatDB <bharatdbpg(at)gmail(dot)com>, torsten(dot)rupp(at)gmx(dot)net, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #19095: Test if function exit() is used fail when linked static |
| Date: | 2026-02-18 08:19:16 |
| Message-ID: | aZV2BIsBFpL2K8ci@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Feb 18, 2026 at 09:49:47AM +0530, VASUKI M wrote:
> You are absolutely right — with a stamp file, we need to ensure that its
> timestamp is updated unconditionally so that it remains newer than the
> inputs. Keeping the existence check (if (! -f ...)) would indeed leave the
> stamp file older than the rebuilt library, which can trigger unnecessary
> rebuilds in Makefile-based builds.
Yep, point taken. I have applied this adjustment a couple of minutes
ago. Thanks for the report.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrey Borodin | 2026-02-18 08:58:03 | Re: 17.8 standby crashes during WAL replay from 17.5 primary: "could not access status of transaction" |
| Previous Message | VASUKI M | 2026-02-18 04:19:47 | Re: BUG #19095: Test if function exit() is used fail when linked static |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Nazir Bilal Yavuz | 2026-02-18 08:31:37 | Re: Improve docs syntax checking and enable it in the meson build |
| Previous Message | Laurenz Albe | 2026-02-18 08:03:48 | Re: client_connection_check_interval default value |