Re: [patch] Add process title to test_shm_mq worker

From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Banck <mbanck(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [patch] Add process title to test_shm_mq worker
Date: 2026-02-02 21:46:35
Message-ID: aYEbOwQkcKOyJ8kl@nathan
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Feb 02, 2026 at 11:38:51AM -0600, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> Seems reasonable to me. While it's only a test module, folks might use it
> as a starting point for their own module, so IMHO it's worth setting a good
> example. I'll wait for a couple, but otherwise I'll go commit this soon.

Committed. I ended up moving the new line to the background worker
registration loop so that we can add the worker number to the name, too.

--
nathan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Banck 2026-02-02 22:03:35 Re: [patch] Add process title to test_shm_mq worker
Previous Message Tom Lane 2026-02-02 21:46:31 Re: Decoupling our alignment assumptions about int64 and double