| From: | Michael Banck <mbanck(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [patch] Add process title to test_shm_mq worker |
| Date: | 2026-02-02 22:03:35 |
| Message-ID: | 20260202220335.GC17962@p46.dedyn.io;lightning.p46.dedyn.io |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 02, 2026 at 03:46:35PM -0600, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 02, 2026 at 11:38:51AM -0600, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> > Seems reasonable to me. While it's only a test module, folks might use it
> > as a starting point for their own module, so IMHO it's worth setting a good
> > example. I'll wait for a couple, but otherwise I'll go commit this soon.
>
> Committed.
Thanks!
> I ended up moving the new line to the background worker registration
> loop so that we can add the worker number to the name, too.
Oh right, I missed that one.
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jelte Fennema-Nio | 2026-02-02 22:27:04 | Re: libpq: Bump protocol version to version 3.2 at least until the first/second beta |
| Previous Message | Nathan Bossart | 2026-02-02 21:46:35 | Re: [patch] Add process title to test_shm_mq worker |