Re: Typos in the code and README

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>
Subject: Re: Typos in the code and README
Date: 2026-01-05 00:35:37
Message-ID: aVsHWR7Qx0Af_azn@paquier.xyz
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Jan 04, 2026 at 06:32:14PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> It looks like upstream has fixed the problem -- not by making the
> two instances match, but by removing the parameter altogether
> (see their recent commit 16edd5abb9ce7386e9208b998cd43524480cb801).

Ah, you mean as in [1] as mentioned in [2]. I didn't know this part.
A new sync sounds like a good idea. I am not sure to see a point in
changing the same thing twice, so...

> Maybe it's time for another sync with upstream?

This sounds like a good idea to me. The last sync has been done in
February 2025, so it could be done in the next couple of weeks.

[1]: https://github.com/snowballstem/snowball.git
[2]: https://snowballstem.org/download.html
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2026-01-05 00:46:15 Re: Typos in the code and README
Previous Message Tomas Vondra 2026-01-05 00:21:59 Re: index prefetching