| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: DOCS - Clarify the publication 'publish_via_partition_root' default value. |
| Date: | 2025-12-24 19:58:20 |
| Message-ID: | aUxF3B4Hy512GIq6@momjian.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Dec 19, 2025 at 09:31:36AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 18, 2025 at 11:41 PM Jacob Champion
> <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> > I know it's okay, but I *want* to backpatch, and I would have
> > yesterday except for your email. Does that raise concerns or cause
> > problems in practice?
>
> As far as I understand it shouldn't break community norms either way.
> Also, as per my knowledge there is no clear guidance for such patches.
> It would be good if other committer also shares their view so we can
> also learn and take same action in future. This feature is present
> since PostgreSQL-13 and no real user has reported this problem. It is
> possible that people using this feature are already use to it using
> this feature that it doesn't matter much to them either way. Unless
> someone else responds, I think you can do what you see good to deal
> with this case.
If it is just a wording improvement, I usually do master only. If it is
inaccurate/unclear/not-understandable, I would backpatch to all
releases.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com
Do not let urgent matters crowd out time for investment in the future.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2025-12-24 20:12:19 | Re: Docs: Standardize "cannot" usage in SGML source |
| Previous Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2025-12-24 18:52:05 | Re: POC: enable logical decoding when wal_level = 'replica' without a server restart |