Re: relfilenode statistics

From: Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: relfilenode statistics
Date: 2025-12-15 16:29:18
Message-ID: aUA3XkU9hc1xrtRB@ip-10-97-1-34.eu-west-3.compute.internal
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On Wed, Nov 12, 2025 at 05:03:55PM +0000, Bertrand Drouvot wrote:
> In favor of not copying, I would say make the code simpler.
>
> I'm in favor of copying but open to different point of views.

PFA a mandatory rebase.

Regards,

--
Bertrand Drouvot
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

Attachment Content-Type Size
v8-0001-Key-PGSTAT_KIND_RELATION-by-relfile-locator.patch text/x-diff 26.3 KB
v8-0002-handle-relation-statistics-correctly-during-rewri.patch text/x-diff 25.9 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2025-12-15 16:35:25 Re: [BUG] [PATCH] pg_basebackup produces wrong incremental files after relation truncation in segmented tables
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2025-12-15 16:11:05 Re: POC: make mxidoff 64 bits