Re: POC: make mxidoff 64 bits

From: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>
To: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, Maxim Orlov <orlovmg(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>, wenhui qiu <qiuwenhuifx(at)gmail(dot)com>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: POC: make mxidoff 64 bits
Date: 2025-12-15 16:11:05
Message-ID: 6dc0880b-15fb-42cf-abfc-62d9d80dd287@iki.fi
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 15/12/2025 16:31, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> On my laptop with jit_above_cost=0 and jit_optimize_above_cost=1000,
> like on those buildfarm animals, the multixid generation workload runs
> in under 10 s. I suppose it could be 20x slower on a slow, busy system.
> So the straightforward fix is to bump up the timeout.

I bumped the timeout to 4 * 180 s. I also added a few progress report
notes to the test output, so that we get a better picture of where the
time goes.

- Heikki

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bertrand Drouvot 2025-12-15 16:29:18 Re: relfilenode statistics
Previous Message Xuneng Zhou 2025-12-15 15:38:11 Re: Add WALRCV_CONNECTING state to walreceiver