| From: | Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pgsql: Teach DSM registry to ERROR if attaching to an uninitialized ent |
| Date: | 2025-11-26 21:21:13 |
| Message-ID: | aSdvSZz9DMPmuGTk@nathan |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Nov 25, 2025 at 07:13:03PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2025 at 4:16 PM Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> My tests seem happy, so I will plan on committing these patches tomorrow.
>> The only difference in v4 is that pg_get_dsm_registry_allocations() will no
>> longer show partially-initialized entries. I thought that was the best
>> option in this case because such entries shouldn't have any allocated
>> memory, and retrying GetNamed*() would set *found to false.
>
> Without actually opening the new patch files, that seems OK to me. I
> think the important thing about such a view is that it shouldn't make
> any state changes; it should just show how things are. In my ideal
> world, it would probably show partially-initialized entires in some
> distinguishable way, like with a null size. But leaving them out is
> also defensible. The thing that I think really matters for failure
> cases is the ability to retry whatever's gone wrong, either to get it
> fixed or to see the error, and the other changes already accomplish
> that goal, so I'm happy.
Committed, thanks for reviewing.
--
nathan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Rowley | 2025-11-26 21:44:05 | pgsql: Have the planner replace COUNT(ANY) with COUNT(*), when possible |
| Previous Message | Nathan Bossart | 2025-11-26 21:16:04 | pgsql: Teach DSM registry to retry entry initialization if needed. |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dean Rasheed | 2025-11-26 21:39:42 | Re: Second RewriteQuery complains about first RewriteQuery in edge case |
| Previous Message | Álvaro Herrera | 2025-11-26 21:15:19 | Re: IPC/MultixactCreation on the Standby server |