Re: 10% drop in code line count in PG 17

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
Cc: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 10% drop in code line count in PG 17
Date: 2025-11-22 17:02:10
Message-ID: aSHskqn2YcrZrkcP@momjian.us
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Nov 21, 2025 at 01:13:50PM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 21.11.25 01:49, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Actually, another discussion would be why we have src/tools/codelines in
> > the git tree at all. I added it in 2005 to use in counting code lines,
> > and I thought we could consider it our standard method, but I am not
> > sure anyone aside from me even uses it, and it is clear there are
> > multiple methods people consider valid. Should we just remove it?
>
> I think so.

Removed.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com

Do not let urgent matters crowd out time for investment in the future.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bernice Southey 2025-11-22 17:05:56 Re: Add notification on BEGIN ATOMIC SQL functions using temp relations
Previous Message ocean_li_996 2025-11-22 16:05:49 Re: Fix logical decoding not track transaction duringSNAPBUILD_BUILDING_SNAPSHOT