From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
---|---|
To: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
Cc: | Jelte Fennema-Nio <me(at)jeltef(dot)nl>, Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: CI: Add task that runs pgindent |
Date: | 2025-10-22 04:33:43 |
Message-ID: | aPhep9yW8M3Jghe5@paquier.xyz |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Oct 21, 2025 at 05:04:50PM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> Indeed there is, I admittedly was under the impression that koel ran pgperltidy
> but clearly I was wrong.
The original thread about forcing a stronger indentation policy was
that we could begin with the C code, leaving everything that is not C
up to the committer who pushes a change.
Another one would be a check on reformat-dat-files. Personally, I
tend to be careful with the dat files, or the indentation of the perl
code before pushing anything. The trend I am seeing is that a lot of
committers are very careful about that as well, so perhaps we could go
one step higher. Fireproof vest is on and ready for impact.
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2025-10-22 04:49:10 | Re: Skip unregistered custom kinds on stats load |
Previous Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2025-10-22 04:31:46 | Re: LISTEN/NOTIFY bug: VACUUM sets frozenxid past a xid in async queue |