Re: Orphan page in _bt_split

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Konstantin Knizhnik <knizhnik(at)garret(dot)ru>
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Orphan page in _bt_split
Date: 2025-09-18 04:28:43
Message-ID: aMuKezVkoJJF8LIS@paquier.xyz
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Sep 16, 2025 at 10:26:12AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Saying that, this patch sounds like a good idea, making these code
> paths a bit more reliable for VACUUM, without paying the cost of an
> allocation. At least for HEAD, that's nice to have. Peter, what do
> you think?

Hearing nothing, I'm planning to have a second look at it and do
something on HEAD. Feel free if you have any comments.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2025-09-18 04:41:02 Re: Reword messages using "as" instead of "because"
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2025-09-18 03:56:44 Re: POC: enable logical decoding when wal_level = 'replica' without a server restart