Re: Orphan page in _bt_split

From: Константин Книжник <knizhnik(at)garret(dot)ru>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Orphan page in _bt_split
Date: 2025-09-22 16:44:18
Message-ID: 7D505E11-A2FC-49A2-A0C1-4CDB59C4EF26@garret.ru
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 18 Sep 2025, at 7:28 AM, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2025 at 10:26:12AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> Saying that, this patch sounds like a good idea, making these code
>> paths a bit more reliable for VACUUM, without paying the cost of an
>> allocation. At least for HEAD, that's nice to have. Peter, what do
>> you think?
>
> Hearing nothing, I'm planning to have a second look at it and do
> something on HEAD. Feel free if you have any comments.
> —
> Michael

Attached please find rebased version of the patch with fixed mistypings.

Attachment Content-Type Size
v3_bt_split.patch application/octet-stream 5.6 KB
unknown_filename text/plain 2 bytes

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexandra Wang 2025-09-22 17:31:47 Re: SQL:2023 JSON simplified accessor support
Previous Message Jacob Champion 2025-09-22 15:46:22 Re: _CRT_glob stuff