Re: Remove useless pointer advance in StatsShmemInit()

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Remove useless pointer advance in StatsShmemInit()
Date: 2025-08-18 09:13:05
Message-ID: aKLuoUi01R3t5hIf@paquier.xyz
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Aug 18, 2025 at 09:04:59AM +0000, Bertrand Drouvot wrote:
> As StatsShmemInit() is existing code, let's fix it: the pointer is not used after
> its last advance, so that advance is unnecessary and can be removed.
> @@ -180,7 +180,6 @@ StatsShmemInit(void)

* provides a small efficiency win.
*/
ctl->raw_dsa_area = p;
- p += MAXALIGN(pgstat_dsa_init_size());
dsa = dsa_create_in_place(ctl->raw_dsa_area,
pgstat_dsa_init_size(),
LWTRANCHE_PGSTATS_DSA, NULL);

I'd bet that this is a vestige of the earlier versions discussed for
the pgstats shmem patch, where !IsUnderPostmaster was doing a few more
things with this pointer going down.

One could argue that "p" could be removed, moving the
sizeof(PgStat_ShmemControl) when we set raw_dsa_area, but that's a bit
cleaner with the extra pointer assignment and the comment for
pgStatLocal.shmem. So, why not.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message vignesh C 2025-08-18 09:13:13 Re: Logical Replication of sequences
Previous Message Kirill Reshke 2025-08-18 09:05:20 Re: test_ddl_deparse: Rename test create_sequence_1