| From: | Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: test_ddl_deparse: Rename test create_sequence_1 |
| Date: | 2025-08-18 09:05:20 |
| Message-ID: | CALdSSPh77q4xaM=HG8LeVm0+APyBnpL6-pLBjoLRYX=XpMMTdQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi!
On Mon, 18 Aug 2025 at 12:40, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> While looking at this area of the code, I got confused by the choice
> of using create_sequence_1 as name for one of the scripts in the test
> module test_ddl_deparse. This is usually reserved for alternate
> outputs, but we don't need to rely on that in this case.
I did not find any related discussion or objections in the thread [0],
so this is probably an oversight of b488c58.
Also, do we have any doc about regression file names/alternate
outputs? I did not find any.
[0] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20150508192921.GM2523%40alvh.no-ip.org
--
Best regards,
Kirill Reshke
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2025-08-18 09:13:05 | Re: Remove useless pointer advance in StatsShmemInit() |
| Previous Message | Bertrand Drouvot | 2025-08-18 09:04:59 | Remove useless pointer advance in StatsShmemInit() |