Re: Use-after-free in reorderbuffer.c for INSERT ON CONFLICT

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Postgres bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ethan Mertz <ethan(dot)mertz(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Use-after-free in reorderbuffer.c for INSERT ON CONFLICT
Date: 2025-07-31 22:09:42
Message-ID: aIvppvibN2hvRgPU@paquier.xyz
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On Thu, Jul 31, 2025 at 09:51:21AM -0700, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> Yes, I think it's sensible to keep the current behavior. So the patch
> looks good to me.

Thanks for the review. I am planning to apply that at the beginning
of next week, in time for the next set of minor releases.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2025-07-31 22:12:32 Re: Postgres: Queries are too slow after upgrading to PG17 from PG15
Previous Message Todd Cook 2025-07-31 21:59:34 Re: Postgres: Queries are too slow after upgrading to PG17 from PG15