Re: CHECKPOINT unlogged data

From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org>, Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: CHECKPOINT unlogged data
Date: 2025-07-11 14:57:02
Message-ID: aHEmPoZt6hHbzEwY@nathan
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jul 11, 2025 at 08:43:05AM +0530, Dilip Kumar wrote:
> Thanks now, looks good to me.

Thanks for reviewing.

> Additionally IMHO it would be good to add tests with FLUSH_UNLOGGED TRUE
> and FLUSH_UNLOGGED FALSE as well, I have added a simple 2 test for the
> same in attached file.

I'll add something like this before committing. In the future, please do
not post small add-on patches like this because it confuses cfbot. If you
must, I think appending an unknown extension like ".nocfbot" to the file
name is sufficient to prevent cfbot from picking it up.

--
nathan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dilip Kumar 2025-07-11 15:06:42 Re: CHECKPOINT unlogged data
Previous Message Nathan Bossart 2025-07-11 14:51:40 Re: Horribly slow pg_upgrade performance with many Large Objects