Re: Fix inconsistency in the pg_buffercache documentation

From: Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Fix inconsistency in the pg_buffercache documentation
Date: 2025-07-02 08:06:34
Message-ID: aGToiq3ngjTFrh1m@ip-10-97-1-34.eu-west-3.compute.internal
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On Wed, Jul 02, 2025 at 09:55:52AM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> > On 2 Jul 2025, at 08:23, Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi hackers,
> >
> > While working on [1], I noticed an inconsistency in the pg_buffercache
> > documentation: ba2a3c2302f1 missed to add "the" before the pg_buffercache_numa()
> > function introduction.
>
> Thanks, that does indeed look like an omission.

Thanks for looking at it!

> There seems to be a few more
> on the same page however,

Indeed, there is multiple kind of inconsistency that are worth to fix.

> how about the attached?

LGTM.

Regards,

--
Bertrand Drouvot
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu) 2025-07-02 08:16:01 RE: Report replica identity in pg_publication_tables
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2025-07-02 07:57:50 Re: Fix outdated comments for IndexInfo