Re: Safeguards against incorrect fd flags for fsync()

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Michael Banck <mbanck(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Safeguards against incorrect fd flags for fsync()
Date: 2025-06-24 23:36:01
Message-ID: aFs2YdeYpWmSd_qT@paquier.xyz
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 07:51:08AM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> I got it working, I had to rebuild gnumach with --enable-apic in order
> to get HPET. With that, the regular build-farm checks (check/
> installcheck in contrib, src/test/regress and src/test/isolation) pass
> without patches to testsuite timings.

How many custom patches did you have to apply to the backend to make
these suites work on this platform?
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David G. Johnston 2025-06-25 00:01:29 Re: Huge commitfest app update upcoming: Tags, Draft CF, Help page, and automated commitfest creat/open/close
Previous Message David G. Johnston 2025-06-24 23:35:13 Re: Introduce New Command Processing Chapter to Documentation