| From: | Michael Banck <mbanck(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Safeguards against incorrect fd flags for fsync() |
| Date: | 2025-06-25 06:04:59 |
| Message-ID: | 685b918c.050a0220.164a50.04e1@mx.google.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 25, 2025 at 08:36:01AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 07:51:08AM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> > I got it working, I had to rebuild gnumach with --enable-apic in order
> > to get HPET. With that, the regular build-farm checks (check/
> > installcheck in contrib, src/test/regress and src/test/isolation) pass
> > without patches to testsuite timings.
>
> How many custom patches did you have to apply to the backend to make
> these suites work on this platform?
Just those two (i.e. the one I posted in this thread and one adopted
from the current Debian package and discussed in [1]):
https://github.com/postgres/postgres/compare/master...mbanck:postgres:hurd-port
I am going to post them again for the next commitfest.
Michael
[1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/6846e0c3.df0a0220.39ef9b.c60e%40mx.google.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bertrand Drouvot | 2025-06-25 06:05:21 | Re: pgsql: Introduce pg_shmem_allocations_numa view |
| Previous Message | jian he | 2025-06-25 05:56:51 | Re: SQL:2023 JSON simplified accessor support |