On Fri, Jun 27, 2025 at 02:45:58PM +0500, Andrey Borodin wrote:
> I'm +1 on having full-fledged injection points in back branches
> where possible. Right now I'm debugging a PG-17(probably) problem
> where injection preloading would be handy (though functionality is
> available via hacks, just a little more work).
>
> But are you going to backpatch all new features of injection points
> in future? It's potentially x6 more work.
That may be nice, but I'd be interested in seeing how things evolve
across v17 first before taking a decision for older branches.
--
Michael