Re: Backpatching injection point core facilities to REL_17_STABLE

From: Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Backpatching injection point core facilities to REL_17_STABLE
Date: 2025-06-27 09:45:58
Message-ID: B8E6B9F8-FDFC-4E77-965B-018551B6E74A@yandex-team.ru
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 27 Jun 2025, at 14:25, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>
> Thoughts or comments?

I'm +1 on having full-fledged injection points in back branches where possible. Right now I'm debugging a PG-17(probably) problem where injection preloading would be handy (though functionality is available via hacks, just a little more work).

But are you going to backpatch all new features of injection points in future? It's potentially x6 more work.

Thanks!

Best regards, Andrey Borodin.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrei Lepikhov 2025-06-27 10:01:04 Re: Memory consumed by paths during partitionwise join planning
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2025-06-27 09:25:46 Backpatching injection point core facilities to REL_17_STABLE