Re: pg_get_multixact_members not documented

From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Sami Imseih <samimseih(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_get_multixact_members not documented
Date: 2025-06-27 22:32:29
Message-ID: aF8b_fp_9Va58vB9@nathan
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jun 12, 2025 at 03:10:56PM -0500, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> Barring comments/objections, I'll plan on committing/back-patching this in
> the near future.

Here is what I have staged for commit. I ended up moving it to the
"Transaction ID and Snapshot Information Functions" table, which is what I
think you had originally proposed. Creating a new section for this seemed
unnecessary, and this table already has one multixact-related function.

--
nathan

Attachment Content-Type Size
v6-0001-Document-pg_get_multixact_members.patch text/plain 3.2 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rishu Bagga 2025-06-27 22:43:53 Re: Proposal to add page headers to SLRU pages
Previous Message Cary Huang 2025-06-27 22:07:53 Re: Support tid range scan in parallel?