From: | Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Sami Imseih <samimseih(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pg_get_multixact_members not documented |
Date: | 2025-06-30 04:29:23 |
Message-ID: | CAExHW5u9Kz4E3jMX=EUChW2XGx862CXw5XT2VejwHXhPK810tA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Jun 28, 2025 at 4:02 AM Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 12, 2025 at 03:10:56PM -0500, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> > Barring comments/objections, I'll plan on committing/back-patching this in
> > the near future.
>
> Here is what I have staged for commit. I ended up moving it to the
> "Transaction ID and Snapshot Information Functions" table, which is what I
> think you had originally proposed. Creating a new section for this seemed
> unnecessary, and this table already has one multixact-related function.
WFM.
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Daisuke Higuchi | 2025-06-30 04:44:58 | Typo in pg_stat_activity definition |
Previous Message | vignesh C | 2025-06-30 04:13:11 | Re: pg_logical_slot_get_changes waits continously for a partial WAL record spanning across 2 pages |