Re: Partitioned tables and [un]loggedness

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Shinya Kato <shinya11(dot)kato(at)gmail(dot)com>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, rmt(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Partitioned tables and [un]loggedness
Date: 2025-06-06 01:55:32
Message-ID: aEJKlGv19ZrlDOFe@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jun 05, 2025 at 03:04:45PM -0500, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> IMHO a case can be reasonably made that this is an oversight in the related
> commit. I've added the rest of the RMT here in case they see it
> differently.
>
> The patch LGTM, too.

Okay, thanks. Let's wait for a couple of days in case there are more
opinions and/or comments. I propose to apply the patch around the
beginning of next week if there are no objections.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2025-06-06 02:06:24 Re: Improve explicit cursor handling in pg_stat_statements
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2025-06-06 01:42:20 Re: Retiring some encodings?