| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Retiring some encodings? |
| Date: | 2025-06-06 01:42:20 |
| Message-ID: | aEJHfA1IFCxxnwdp@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jun 05, 2025 at 08:05:20PM -0400, Andres Freund wrote:
> There has been plenty discussion about GB18030, and it seems we aren't likely
> to be able to drop that.
Yes, as per upthread.
> I think there are a lot easier cases though. The easiest probably is
> MULE_INTERNAL - all discussions referencing it seem to be about oddities of
> MULE_INTERNAL, not about using it. I think it's been effectively unused since
> it's introduction. Due to not even having a conversion path to UTF-8 it's
> really not practically usable IMO.
Perhaps, yes. I still need to do some homework here and gather some
data to share, FWIW.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2025-06-06 01:55:32 | Re: Partitioned tables and [un]loggedness |
| Previous Message | Jeff Davis | 2025-06-06 00:38:36 | CREATE DATABASE command for non-libc providers |