Re: Random subscription 021_twophase test failure on kestrel

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Ajin Cherian <itsajin(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Random subscription 021_twophase test failure on kestrel
Date: 2025-05-26 08:29:42
Message-ID: aDQmdqJCKUSWngfq@paquier.xyz
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, May 24, 2025 at 11:27:05AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Sat, May 24, 2025 at 6:07 AM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>> Yes, agreed that your suggested fix looks sensible with an extra check
>> for pg_prepared_xacts on the subscriber side that can be useful for
>> debugging.
>
> +1.

Applied down to v15.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Feike Steenbergen 2025-05-26 08:56:45 Re: pg18: Virtual generated columns are not (yet) safe when superuser selects from them
Previous Message ikedamsh 2025-05-26 07:55:33 Re: Assertion failure in smgr.c when using pg_prewarm with partitioned tables