Re: Random subscription 021_twophase test failure on kestrel

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Ajin Cherian <itsajin(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Random subscription 021_twophase test failure on kestrel
Date: 2025-05-24 05:57:05
Message-ID: CAA4eK1J5GtxqZEOHzHzB1ihNQgtaAMp2po9Tfd=qyt5Bs4Ns3Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, May 24, 2025 at 6:07 AM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>
>
> Yes, agreed that your suggested fix looks sensible with an extra check
> for pg_prepared_xacts on the subscriber side that can be useful for
> debugging.
>

+1.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Feike Steenbergen 2025-05-24 06:38:50 Re: pg18: Virtual generated columns are not (yet) safe when superuser selects from them
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2025-05-24 05:30:16 Re: Conflict detection for update_deleted in logical replication