| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Lukas Fittl <lukas(at)fittl(dot)com> |
| Cc: | David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Shaik Mohammad Mujeeb <mujeeb(dot)sk(at)zohocorp(dot)com>, ilyaevdokimov <ilya(dot)evdokimov(at)tantorlabs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, mujeebskdev <mujeeb(dot)sk(dot)dev(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Add comment explaining why queryid is int64 in pg_stat_statements |
| Date: | 2025-05-20 05:09:13 |
| Message-ID: | aCwOeWZrunWikI4d@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 08:43:25PM -0700, Lukas Fittl wrote:
> Yeah, +1 to making this consistent across both query ID and the new plan
> ID, and changing both to int64 internally seems best.
Any thoughts from others? I'm OK to take the extra step of switching
both fields on HEAD and write a patch for that, relying on what David
has sent as a first step towards that.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 2025-05-20 05:39:46 | Re: Adding null patch entry to cfbot/CommitFest |
| Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2025-05-20 04:54:14 | Re: Conflict detection for update_deleted in logical replication |