Re: Conflict detection for update_deleted in logical replication

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nisha Moond <nisha(dot)moond412(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Conflict detection for update_deleted in logical replication
Date: 2025-05-20 04:54:14
Message-ID: CAA4eK1L3n3MSps1Cmn0dMF5r8_-0jznRLydhe5XLHQzqwVXOrg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 8:38 AM shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Please find few more comments:
>
> 1)
> ProcessStandbyPSRequestMessage:
> + /*
> + * This shouldn't happen because we don't support getting primary status
> + * message from standby.
> + */
> + if (RecoveryInProgress())
> + elog(ERROR, "the primary status is unavailable during recovery");
>
>
> a) This error is not clear. Is it supposed to be user oriented error
> or internal error? As a user, it is difficult to interpret this error
> and take some action.
>

This is an internal error for developers to understand that they have
sent the wrong message. Do you have any suggestions to change it?

> b) What I understood is that there is no user of enabling
> 'retain_conflict_info' for a subscription which is subscribing to a
> publisher which is physical standby too. So shall we emit such an
> ERROR during 'Create Sub(retain_conflict_info=on)' itself? But that
> would need checking whether the publisher is physical standby or not
> during CREATE-SUB. Is that a possibility?
>

The 0003 patch already took care of this, see check_conflict_info_retaintion.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2025-05-20 05:09:13 Re: Add comment explaining why queryid is int64 in pg_stat_statements
Previous Message shveta malik 2025-05-20 04:24:23 Re: Logical Replication of sequences