Re: PG 18 release notes draft committed

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PG 18 release notes draft committed
Date: 2025-05-07 01:17:15
Message-ID: aBq0myUhKHLNq2d9@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, May 7, 2025 at 09:27:14AM +1200, David Rowley wrote:
> On Wed, 7 May 2025 at 07:44, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> > I think what you are saying is that this has to do with partition
> > processing of joins, but not the pruning process. I don't think a
> > non-partition joins are likely to hit 32 EquivalenceClasses.
>
> A query such as: SELECT * FROM table_with_lots_of_partitions ORDER BY
> col; will plan much faster now. No joins there.

Ah, interesting. I am guessing the ORDER BY requires the
EquivalenceClasses items. Applied patch attached. I don't think we can
make more precise wording for this item.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com

Do not let urgent matters crowd out time for investment in the future.

Attachment Content-Type Size
master.diff text/x-diff 600 bytes

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2025-05-07 01:18:11 Re: disabled SSL log_like tests
Previous Message Steve Chavez 2025-05-07 00:34:04 Re: Allow database owners to CREATE EVENT TRIGGER