Re: PG 18 release notes draft committed

From: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PG 18 release notes draft committed
Date: 2025-05-06 21:27:14
Message-ID: CAApHDvqgK7uqPZAwxsfBiFhvBHHB0txaUxhUrdwG4d5Mik_RnA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 7 May 2025 at 07:44, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> I think what you are saying is that this has to do with partition
> processing of joins, but not the pruning process. I don't think a
> non-partition joins are likely to hit 32 EquivalenceClasses.

A query such as: SELECT * FROM table_with_lots_of_partitions ORDER BY
col; will plan much faster now. No joins there.

David

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2025-05-06 22:00:37 Re: Adding skip scan (including MDAM style range skip scan) to nbtree
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2025-05-06 21:17:05 Re: PG 18 release notes draft committed