| From: | Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> | 
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> | 
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Nisha Moond <nisha(dot)moond412(at)gmail(dot)com>, Euler Taveira <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> | 
| Subject: | Re: Large expressions in indexes can't be stored (non-TOASTable) | 
| Date: | 2025-05-06 16:41:49 | 
| Message-ID: | aBo7zUx3XpbA2Jo1@nathan | 
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email | 
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers | 
On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 09:57:46AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2025 at 02:01:54PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I'm inclined to argue that it's a bug fix and therefore still in-scope
>> for v18.  The fact that we can't back-patch such a change is all the
>> more reason to not let it slide another year.
> 
> Not on the RMT.  I have looked at the patch, and I would agree with
> doing that now in v18 rather than wait for v19 to open up.
> 
>> But probably the RMT should make the call.
> 
> Yes.
I brought this up with the RMT, and everyone seemed okay with committing it
for v18.
> This has been mentioned upthread, but I am questioning the wisdom of
> putting the restriction based on MAX_RONAME_LEN only in
> pg_replication_origin_create(), while replorigin_create() is the one
> that actually matters.  While it is true that these restrictions are
> enforced for the current callers in core, it could also be called by
> stuff outside of core.  It seems important to me to let these
> potential callers know about the restriction in place.
I can move it back to replorigin_create().  I don't have a strong opinion
here.
-- 
nathan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dmitry Dolgov | 2025-05-06 17:37:11 | Re: queryId constant squashing does not support prepared statements | 
| Previous Message | Nathan Bossart | 2025-05-06 16:39:33 | Re: add --sequence-data to pg_dumpall |