Re: WIP: Covering + unique indexes.

From: Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Anastasia Lubennikova <a(dot)lubennikova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Alexander Kuzmenkov <a(dot)kuzmenkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Subject: Re: WIP: Covering + unique indexes.
Date: 2018-04-07 13:51:35
Message-ID: a91d81fb-0fc8-3364-d9b6-68e70f1c9952@sigaev.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> I didn't like rel.h being included in itup.h. Do you really need a
> Relation as argument to index_truncate_tuple? It looks to me like you
> could pass the tupledesc instead; indnatts could be passed as a separate
> argument instead of IndexRelationGetNumberOfAttributes.
>

Hm, okay, I understand why, will fix by you suggestion

--
Teodor Sigaev E-mail: teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru
WWW: http://www.sigaev.ru/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jesper Pedersen 2018-04-07 13:55:19 Re: [HACKERS] Runtime Partition Pruning
Previous Message Daniel Verite 2018-04-07 13:48:38 Re: csv format for psql