Re: WIP: Covering + unique indexes.

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
To: Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>, Anastasia Lubennikova <a(dot)lubennikova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Alexander Kuzmenkov <a(dot)kuzmenkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Subject: Re: WIP: Covering + unique indexes.
Date: 2018-04-07 13:24:39
Message-ID: 20180407132439.cc6fhomh7oovzdxm@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I didn't like rel.h being included in itup.h. Do you really need a
Relation as argument to index_truncate_tuple? It looks to me like you
could pass the tupledesc instead; indnatts could be passed as a separate
argument instead of IndexRelationGetNumberOfAttributes.

--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2018-04-07 13:41:12 Re: [HACKERS] Runtime Partition Pruning
Previous Message Daniel Verite 2018-04-07 13:24:21 Re: csv format for psql